tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21053830.post5735509647974446583..comments2023-08-25T07:16:46.041-05:00Comments on JACblog!: Planned Parenthood files a lawsuit against Nebraska lawJAChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15157676625323331835noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21053830.post-11146907382395727882010-06-29T16:41:49.421-05:002010-06-29T16:41:49.421-05:00Codongolev, that is not what the suit is discussin...Codongolev, that is not what the suit is discussing. If you read the complete article, what they are contesting is providers having to state every possible complication, whether those complications have been validated by the medical community. Specifically cited is the alleged connection between abortion and breast cancer. There is not a proven link - in fact this "link" has been debunked by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society, but it is a commonly used argument to show that there are "hidden dangers" to having an abortion, which is still a legal medical procedure. Doctors would be required to offer this kind of false information to patients under this law.<br /><br />An abortion is a medical procedure, and as such has the potential for complications. The attack on the patient in this case is having a provider required to provide any and all reports that have been linked to abortion, whether or not they have been proven and accepted by the medical establishment.JAChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15157676625323331835noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21053830.post-69584563668191499282010-06-29T16:21:31.464-05:002010-06-29T16:21:31.464-05:00so wait.... telling the patient that an abortion i...so wait.... telling the patient that an abortion is not, in fact, a safe and 100% reliable procedure is an attack on the patient? I fail to see the logic.codongolevnoreply@blogger.com